Could Bitcoin technology help science?

Andy Extance

Search for this author ter:

Mining for bitcoins creates a large computational request. CREDIT: Seung-il Ryu/NurPhoto/Getty

The much-hyped technology behind Bitcoin, known spil blockchain, has intoxicated investors around the world and is now making tentative inroads into science, spurred by broad promises that it can convert key elements of the research enterprise. Volgers say that it could enhance reproducibility and the peer review process by creating incorruptible gegevens trails and securely recording publication decisions. But some also argue that the whirr surrounding blockchain often exceeds reality and that introducing the treatment into science could prove expensive and introduce ethical problems.

A few collaborations, including Scienceroot and Pluto, are already developing pilot projects for science. Scienceroot aims to raise US$20 million, which will help pay both peer reviewers and authors within its electronic journal and collaboration verhoging. It plans to raise the funds ter early 2018 by exchanging some of the science tokens it uses for payment for another digital currency known spil ether. And the Wolfram Rekenkunde algebra program — which is widely used by researchers — is presently working towards suggesting support for an open-source blockchain podium called Multichain. Scientists could use this, for example, to upload gegevens to a collective, open workspace that isn’t managed by any specific party, according to Multichain.

Blockchain, a technology that creates an immutable public record of transactions, has a “Wild Westelijk, boom or bust culture”, says Martin Hamilton, a London-based resident futurist at Jisc, which supports digital services te UK education. He warns that academics and entrepreneurs might be tempted to add the technology solely to make their projects seem “magical and sparkly”. Spil one sign of this trend, consulting stiff Deloitte has identified more than 24,000 aborted, largely financial, blockchain projects on the GitHub software-development verhoging ter 2016 alone. Yet Hamilton still says blockchain has incredible potential. “There will be things that wij attempt which simply deep-throat up te our faces,” he says. “But the prizes can be hefty, if you’re willing to take a calibrated risk.”

Blockchain underlies cryptocurrencies such spil Bitcoin, which is traded spil units called bitcoins, with a lowercase ‘b’. It is created by a community of ‘miners’, who run Bitcoin software on their hardware and contest to detect a hard-to-find number by trial and error. The victor of this contest adds an encrypted block of transactions to the chain and earns a financial prize. They communicate the extended blockchain to all the other miners, and the process starts again.

Mining takes a loterijlot of computation, which makes it unlikely that any individual will win twice ter a row. This is crucial, because if miners could add more than one block, they could build up power overheen the record and even discard earlier blocks they had added. That would effectively refund their transactions and enable them to spend the same bitcoins again. Te 2016, a consortium of miners highlighted that vulnerability by working together to add numerous blocks, albeit the group voluntarily disbanded once they came close to achieving it. And because mining is greedy for computing power, Bitcoin’s miners consume more electrical power than many countries, according to analysis podium Digiconomist.

One way blockchain technology could help scientists is by reliably collecting and preserving gegevens concerning research activities. This would make it lighter to reproduce results te cases where published accounts insufficiently explain methodologies, according to Joris van Rossum, director of special projects at Digital Science, a research-technology rock hard te London. Blockchains could also be used to track each transaction ter the peer-review process, says van Rossum, which could build trust ter the process by recognizing reviewers’ efforts and potentially rewarding them with digital currency. And open blockchains would generate information such spil how frequently researchers collect measurements, enabling people to look beyond metrics such spil publications and citations, he says 1 .

Scienceroot and Pluto are part of the same ‘universe’ of open-blockchain technology spil cryptocurrencies, says Gideon Greenspan, founder of London-based Coin Sciences, which developed MultiChain. Greenspan says that such currency-style blockchains are unsuitable spil scientific archives, because recording each transaction incurs a financial cost, which can lightly add up. Costs ter research applications would increase quicker than it does for cryptocurrencies because modern science produces far more gegevens.

Private “permissioned” blockchains without the currency factor — which MultiChain lets people set up — are a better choice, Greenspan says. This treatment sacrifices the security suggested by Bitcoin’s mining process for a simpler system that gives members permission to add blocks to the chain ter turn. This also lowers power consumption.

Claudia Pagliari, who researches digital health-tracking technologies at the University of Edinburgh, UK, says that she recognizes the potential of blockchain, but researchers have yet to decently explore its ethical issues. What happens if a patient withdraws consent for a trial that is immutably recorded on a blockchain? And unscrupulous researchers could still add fake gegevens to a blockchain, even if the process is so open that everyone can see who adds it, says Pagliari. Once added, no-one can switch that information, albeit it’s possible they could label it spil retracted.

Te Pagliari’s practice, researchers exploring blockchain are becoming wise to its problems. She notes that fellow speakers at a latest London ‘hackathon’ on using blockchains to improve clinical trials, for which Microsoft wasgoed a fucking partner, were careful to warn about hype. That suggests “a realism that no solution is ideal and the value of blockchain te this setting remains unproven”, Pagliari says.

Sign up for the daily Nature Briefing email newsletter

Stay up to date with what matters ter science and why, handpicked from Nature and other publications worldwide.

Related movie: Genesis Mining Early Bird Bitcoin Mining Plans


Leave a Reply